Ranjeet Mudholkar is a leading EB1A expert & CEO of Next League Executive Board LLC, which helps professionals fulfill their American Dream.
In a world awash with ideas, one question distinguishes visionaries from imitators: Is this truly original? Whether you’re a venture capitalist evaluating a startup, a patent officer reviewing an invention or an academic assessing research, answering this question demands an evidence-based standard. That’s why I created the Mudholkar Originality Metrics, a framework to quantify innovation with precision. Rooted in mathematics, computer science and legal evidence standards, these metrics can help empower decision makers to verify originality across industries.
Why We Need A New Standard For Originality
Today’s innovation landscape is saturated. Generative AI can simulate novelty, citation inflation distorts impact and polished credentials often obscure derivative work. In such an environment, distinguishing authentic originality from imitation has never been harder—or more essential.
Over the past decade, I’ve developed several frameworks to help professionals demonstrate excellence with clarity and credibility—from the Mudholkar Mastery Matrix to the Mudholkar Blueprints of Achievement. These tools address critical dimensions of leadership, impact and financial strength. But none directly tackled the core challenge of proving originality in a form that satisfies the evidentiary standards of scientific journals, federal courts and global institutions alike. That’s the gap the Mudholkar Originality Metrics framework is built to fill—offering a quantifiable and implementable definition of originality fit for a complex, interdisciplinary world.
Three Pillars Of Innovation
The framework evaluates innovation through three lenses:
1. Is it a new idea?
When developing this first question, I thought about the Fields Medal, a prestigious honor akin to the Nobel Prize that is bestowed upon mathematicians under the age of 40 for groundbreaking research. This axis assesses whether the work introduces a groundbreaking concept or paradigm shift. For example, a new algorithm that revolutionizes carbon capture would score high here.
2. Can it be built?
Inspired by Alan Turing’s concept of computability, this axis asks whether the idea can be coded, engineered or scaled for real-world use. For example, an AI-powered diagnostic system deployed in hospitals could earn top marks in this category.
3. Will it hold up?
The 1993 court case, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, helped establish guidelines around how scientific evidence is presented and assessed in legal proceedings. Similarly, this axis ensures that an idea is testable, peer-reviewed and accepted by experts—a key component for courts, journals or government bodies. A medical device with FDA approval and clinical trials would perform well on this axis.
How To Apply The Metrics
Each axis is scored on a 1-10 scale, and the composite score is the arithmetic mean. A score greater than nine signals a field-defining breakthrough, 8-8.9 denotes pioneering work and 6-7.9 reflects moderate originality. Anything below a six is likely incremental or derivative.
For a real-world example, let’s take a look at a concept involving decoding speech perception. In a 2022 Frontiers in Neuroscience study, researchers introduced an EEG-based model to understand how cochlear implant users process speech. Applying my Mudholkar Originality Metrics framework, here’s how it fared when put through the series of questions:
• Is it a new idea? Yes, it demonstrates advanced theoretical modeling in cognitive neuroscience.
• Can it be built? Yes, the idea enables new auditory processing algorithms.
• Will it hold up? Yes, it has been peer-reviewed and cited in top neuroscience journals.
Ultimately, I gave this idea a score of 8.9 and believe it will shape the next generation of cochlear implant designs and neuroprosthetics worldwide.
Who Can Use The Mudholkar Originality Metrics
This framework can be used by a variety of groups, including:
• Investors (e.g., assess novelty before major VC deployment)
• Regulators (e.g., use as a tool for EB1A and IP evaluation)
• Academics (e.g., help conduct grant reviews and tenure evaluations)
• Founders and professionals (e.g., pitch originality credibly to decision makers)
In an era where signals of excellence are diluted by automation and synthetic credentials, institutions need a way to validate true innovation. The Mudholkar Originality Metrics can provide that filter as a system that quantifies novelty with transparency, helps ensure practical implementation and aims to meet legal and scientific standards. In other words, originality is no longer a vibe. It’s a verifiable benchmark. Whether you’re an innovator, evaluator or policymaker, this tool can help you separate brilliance from buzz.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Read the full article here
